Majority leader Mitch McConnell wrapped the President’s proposed $2,000 stimulus checks with two hot-button issues, in what appears to be a poison pill of a proposal. Shortly before adjourning the Senate on Tuesday afternoon, the Leader introduced a bill that would combine the (House-approved) increased direct payments with 1. the repeal of online liability protections known as section 230, and 2. the establishment of a commission to study voter fraud. The latter two issues have been touted by POTUS for weeks, but now lack universal support among Senate Republicans and have little support among House Democrats.
McConnell stated the he would not be “bullied” into action despite pressure from President Trump, House Democrats and even some Senate Republicans. Tuesday, the House passed a stimulus bill that would have raised the $600 payments to $2,000.
“The Senate is not going to be bullied into rushing out more borrowed money into the hands of Democrats’ rich friends who don’t need the help,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell
On Sunday, POTUS signed into law a $900 billion economic relief package that would send $600 stimulus checks to more than 100 million Americans. On Wednesday, Senate Democrats urged McConnell to bring the House bill to the Senate floor for a vote, arguing that a weakening economy and raging pandemic are creating enormous hardship for millions of Americans. “At the very least, the Senate deserves the opportunity for an up-or-down vote,” said Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), as he took the floor to blast McConnell in a speech.
Stocks held levels just fractionally below the all-time highs set Monday and Tuesday. With one day to trade, the S&P 500 is poised to log a 15% gain for 2020, the Russell 2000 a 19% gain, and the NASDAQ Composite a 43% gain. The yield of the 10-Year Treasury fell from 1.92% to 0.93% in 2020.
To look at real-world choices any investor can make, we graphed the ratio of SIVR and SLV, two Silver ETFs, over a 10-year period. Each fund does a fine job of tracking the price of Silver and of tracking the other fund.
At the start of 2011, the ratio (SIVR / SLV) was 101.8%. Today the ratio is almost 103.9%. Over 10-years, the ratio has gained 2.1%, or 0.21% per year. As SIVR has a lower fee (0.30% vs. 0.50%) its performance has been superior to that of SLV by the exact difference in fees. For a hypothetical $100,000 investment, the difference would have been $2,000, with SIVR being the better performer.
The folks at iShares (Blackrock) do more advertising than the folks at Aberdeen Standard. SLV is 17-times larger by AUM than SIVR, so it may offer better liquidity. When we checked the two markets at 11:00 am on 12/29, we found the following:
25.27 x 1,000
25.29 x 2,900
24.30 x 28,00
24.31 x 40,700
Market at 11:00 AM on Tuesday, 29 December 2020
The market for SLV is $0.01 narrower and the quantities bid-for and offered are substantially (15 times) larger. The $0.01 difference in spread amounts to just 0.04% (4 bps) however. This might be important for a very large investor or for a high frequency trader, but probably not for a long-term investor.
Before you make any investment in a fund or ETF, you should look at competing investment alternatives, and consider their fees and liquidity, relative to your needs.
Blackrock purchased iShares from Barclay’s in 2009.
Aberdeen Standard is the investment management arm of Standard Life Aberdeen, founded in 1825.
Disclaimer: It is important to note that past performance is not indicative of future results.
In an unexpected plot twist, the fifth-round coronavirus aid package, which appeared to be a done deal, has hit a last minute road block with President Trump demanding Congress amend the legislation.
After the House passed the $900B package in a 359 to 53 vote and the Senate approved the package 92 to 6, it was assumed that the President would sign the deal into law. In a surprise video announcement on Tuesday night, the President called the package a “disgrace” and demanded changes to the bipartisan legislation. President Trump specifically took aim at funding headed overseas, and direct payments to individuals and families.
“I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000, or $4,000 for a couple,” Trump declared. “I’m also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation.”
President Donald J. Trump on Twitter
If the President vetoes the legislation, the House and Senate could vote to override Trump’s decision. After all, the bill passed with a veto-proof majority in Congress. The process, however, would certainly delay the outflow of funds, and fall short of Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin’s promise that stimulus checks could begin reaching American households next week. Stay tuned.
On Monday, in a 359 to 53 vote, the House overwhelmingly passed a fifth-round spending package. Monday night, the Senate approved the measure in a 92 to 6 vote. The president is expected to sign the legislation on Tuesday.
After six months of negotiations, Congress reached an agreement on a $900B coronavirus spending package. Just shy of $1 trillion, it is the second-largest economic relief bill in the nation’s history. Passed in March, the CARES Act totaled $2.2T.
The legislation includes $600 in direct payments to individuals, $300 per week of enhanced unemployment benefits, and funding for small businesses, vaccine distribution, food assistance, education and child care. It also covers rental relief, extending the nationwide eviction moratorium through January 31, 2021.
Monday’s market action was extremely volatile, with a 2.0% sell-off in the morning, which was followed by a 1.6% rally to the close. The S&P 500 Index was lower on Monday by 0.4%.
In a note circulated over the weekend, JPMorgan Chief US Equity Strategist Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, stated,
The equity market is facing one of the best backdrops for sustained gains in years. After a prolonged period of elevated risks (global trade war, COVID-19 pandemic, US Election uncertainty, etc.), the outlook is significantly clearing with the business cycle expanding and risks diminishing…”
As reported by Yahoo Finance, the average Wall Street call for the S&P 500 Index in 2021 is 4,150. From Friday’s closing value of 3,709 that represents a rise of 11.9%. JPMorgan’s call for 2021 is significantly higher at 4,400, a rise of 18.6%. The JPM strategist suggested a range of 4,200 to 4,600 around his target.
The JPMorgan strategist cited several assumptions that underlie his thesis: 1. World Central Banks continue to supply easy money; 2. Vaccine delivery runs smoothly in the US; and 3. the US ends-up with a divided government after the run-off elections in Georgia.
The S&P 500 is a capitalization-weighted index of stocks price performance in the US.
Past performance in not a predictor of future results.
The opinion of the strategist cited above is his and his alone.
November nonfarm payrolls rose by 245k, significantly less than the 460k expected, according to Bloomberg. October payrolls, were revised down from a 638k rise to 610k, and September payrolls were revised higher from a 672k rise to 711k. The net change in nonfarm payrolls (November data + revisions) was a 256k rise. Employers have added 12.3M jobs since May, slightly more than half of the 22.2M jobs lost in March and April.
This week’s data indicates improvement in the U.S. jobs market with a larger-than-expected decline in weekly jobless claims and the November employment report showing an addition of hundreds of thousands of new payroll jobs, the seventh consecutive month of positive job creation. The pace of job creation, however, has slowed noticeably from the pace seen in the fall. Nearly 10M Americans remain unemployed and millions more are reliant on federal unemployment assistance. With federal assistance and forbearance opportunities set to expire at year-end, and increasingly onerous restrictions and lockdown measures coming, further job losses and business closures are expected. This scenario paints an increasingly difficult scenario for households and workers.
Financial markets see the news for its impact on Fed policy. A weak jobs market makes it more likely the the Federal Reserve will act aggressively at it December meeting. Expectations are that the Fed will increase the duration of its bond-buying program. The Fed’s balance sheet has risen by more than $3 trillion in 2020 alone. See FRB data above.